Risk-Based Pricing Notices
by Timothy Raty, DocuTech Compliance Specialist
On December 22, 2009 the Federal Reserve and the Federal Trade Commission (the “Agencies”) released new and finalized rules for risk-based pricing notices, which will become effective on January 1, 2011.
The Federal Reserve Board has implemented part of these new regulations in 12 CFR §222 et el. The Federal Trade Commission has placed the rest in 16 CFR §§640 & 698. A comprehensive analysis of these regulations was provided by the Federal Reserve Board, entitled Fair Credit Reporting Risk-Based Pricing Regulations.
A detailed analysis of these rules is beyond the scope of this article, particularly since such an analysis has been done by the Federal Reserve (at 203 pages in length). However, the following is a summary of the requirements that affect the basic disclosure (e.g. when it needs to be given, what it should contain, etc.)
What does this new regulation require?
It requires a “user” who is taking adverse action against a consumer, based on a consumer report, to disclose a risk-based pricing notice.
Who does the regulation apply to?
They apply to any person that both uses a consumer report in connection with an application for, or a grant, extension, or other provision of credit and, based on in whole or in part on this report, grants credit to that consumer which is less favorable than the most favorable terms available to a good portion of other consumers served by the creditor. This also applies if the consumer is using the credit primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
Finally, it applies to the person to whom the obligation is initially payable (also referred to as `the original creditor’) and the notice requirement only applies in connection with business credit.
What format should the notice contain and what should it contain?
It can be given either orally, in writing, or electronically. If written, it should be written in a clear and conspicuous form. Although compliance will automatically be ascertained by use of the Agencies’ model forms, these are only optional.
15 USCA §1681m [a] & [h][5] requires that the notice provides:
- A statement informing the consumer that the terms of the credit are based on information from a consumer report,
- The name, address, and telephone number of the agency,
- A statement that the reporting agency did not make the decision for the adverse action and is unable to provide the consumer the specific reasons for why such action was taken,
- That the consumer can obtain a free copy of the report from the agency and that there is a 60-day period for obtaining this copy, and
- That the consumer can dispute with the agency the accuracy of completeness of any information in the report furnished.
The Federal Reserve and Trade Commission also requires the notice to contain a statement that the terms offered may be less favorable than those offered to consumers with better credit histories.
When does the notice need to be given?
In general, the notice needs to be provided to the consumer after the terms of credit have been set, but before the consumer becomes contractually obligated to the transaction.
There are, however, two different rules for closed-end and open end credit:
For closed-end credit, the notice must not be provided earlier than when the consumer is told that the transaction has been approved, but it must be given before consummation of the transaction.
For open-end credit, the same rule applies, except that the notice must be provided before the first transaction is made under the plan.
Are there any exceptions to giving this notice?
There are several exceptions:
- A creditor may provide a notice containing the credit score disclosure required by 15 USCA §1681g, along with certain additional information that provides context for the credit score disclosure, for credit secured by one-to-four units of residential real property.
- For credit secured by property that is not one-to-four residential units, a creditor may provide a notice containing the consumer’s credit score and certain additional information that is specified in the final rules.
Under the above two exceptions, if a consumer’s credit file does not contain sufficient information to assess a credit score, a creditor may provide “an alternate narrative notice that does not include a credit score.”
Can the consumer be charged for obtaining a copy of the consumer report?
No. The notice must contain a statement that informs the consumer that he or she may obtain a copy of the consumer report from the consumer reporting agency, without charge.
How many times must the notice be given for each credit extension and what if there are two or more consumers to a transaction?
Only one notice is required per credit extension, except when provided in connection with an account review. When two consumers are involved, a notice must be given to each individual.
Are there any model forms?
Yes. The Agencies have appended these forms to the final rules as Appendices H-1 through H-5 of the Board’s rule and Appendices B-1 through B-5 of the Commission’s rule. The quickest way to access these forms is through the Fair Credit Reporting Risk-Based Pricing Regulations, pg. 152-159.
- Compliant Solutions
- Layers of Compliance
- Compliance Resources
- Investors
- High Cost Loan & Predatory Lending Check
- Compliance Updates
- DocuTech RESPA Resources
Mortgage Compliance Updates - Mortgage Loan Docs
FHA Mortgage Insurance Premium Calculations Financial Reform Is Just Around the Corner Document Imaging versus Electronic Document Management Risk-Based Pricing Notices New California Broker Higher-Priced Mortgage Loan Disclosure Lender's Look to Automate Loan Accuracy Bankers as Buyers 2010 Catching Up On the RESPA FAQs - Transfer Taxes DocuTech Provides Insight on E-Closings and Compliance Issue Using Worksheets In Initial Disclosure Packages New Rules for High Priced Loans Increase in Upfront Premiums for FHA Mortgage Insurance The Safe Act and State Licensed Originators New Model Privacy Notices Mortgage Compliance - Be Good and Lucky A Loan Closer's Nightmare Arkansas Disclosure and Certification VA Itemization of Origination Charge RESPA 2010 - Good Faith Estimate 801 Fee DocuTech Provides Full Service in NetOxygen Cirrus FHA Announces Policy Changes - Jan 2010 DocuTech Launches RESPA Resources Page HUD-1 Settlement Statement (Page 3) Revised NY Pre-Application Disclosure SC Mortgage Loan Originator Unique Identifier Addendum FHA Mortgage Loan Correspondent Disclosure Update to FNMA 1003, Cx4193 FHA 1% Origination Cap Removed Indiana Notice to Borrower New RESPA Documents ConformX - Update to FNMA 1008 Completing the New HUD-1 Settlement Statement Using the Correct Disclosure Package Revised FHA Informed Consumer Choice Disclosure Notice RESPA Reform: GFE Page Two Fast Food and Compliance Higher Priced Mortgage Loans Getting to Know the New Good Faith Estimate (Jan 2010) Prepare Now for January 2010 RESPA Changes Changes to Regulation Z - July 2009 Stay Compliant with Broker ID Laws eDisclosures - Sort Out the Mess Appraisal Integrity Legal and Mortgage Compliance Issues You Need to Know FHA Provides Guidance on New Mexico Security Instrument The Impact of Broker ID Laws Home Valuation Code of Conduct Effective Countrywide/Bank of America Update HVCC Verification of Receipt of Appraisal Form Freddie Bulletin 2008-4: Multiple Subjects The Future Is In Our Hands FHA Risk-Based Premiums Take a Break Changes to California Mortgage Loan Disclosure Statements The New HOEPA Rule - 2008 Housing and Economic Recovery Act - 2008 Rebuild After National Mortgage Crisis New Mortgage Legislation Effective July Courts Side With Borrowers Over Lenders Kentucky Emergency Rule (HB 552) Prepays Kentucky Emergency Rule (HB 552) Home Foreclosure Blocked Due to Predatory Lending Violations HUD Proposes RESPA Reform 2008 California RE 885 Disclosure Massachusetts Borrower Counseling Disclosure Home Valuation Code of Conduct Proposed Regulation-Z Changes DC Adds New Disclosure For Non-Conventional Loans Conforming Loan Limits Increased Countrywide Interest Credit Clarification Maine Net Tangible Benefit Disclosure Up New Massachusetts Regulations Take Effect Maine Requires Net Tangible Benefit Form Colorado Emergency Prepay Rule MERS Requires Street Address on NY Docs Fred Gooch's Article in National Mortgage Professional“DocuTech's commitment to customer satisfaction has been extremely impressive in all arenas, from providing the latest technology to exemplary customer support. All of our concerns have been resolved immediately, and the support team is always available when we need them.”